medication dictionary Prempro

Prempro

Rather than improving long-term health for serious diseases, risks of Prempro apparently outweigh the benefits.

In 2000, Premarin was the second most prescribed drug in the United States with over $1 billion in sales and 46 million prescriptions; Prempro accounted for 22.3 million prescriptions. Large scale Class Action Lawsuits and Personal Injury Litigation are anticipated.

Prempro Hormone Replacement Therapy ( HRT; Wyeth / American Home Products ) is linked to strokes, coronary heart disease (leading to heart attacks), and venous thrombotic embolisms ( blood clots in veins ), the combined risk offsetting the benefits of decrease in colon-rectal cancers and hip fractures (from osteoporosis).

Description:
estrogen 0.625 mg + medroxyprogesterone acetate (2.5 mg)

Usage:
Hysterectomy or menopause replacement

Prempro Adverse Effects:
Increase in stroke, coronary heart disease, blood clot formation, breast cancer

Company:
Wyeth (American Home Products)

Patient presentation:
Stroke, heart attack, many possible sequelae of venous thromboembolism

Further Prempro Lawsuit info:
www.drugintel.com

Despite the low absolute risk (2.5%) of prempro, "the balance of risks significantly outweighs the benefits" (Denise E. Bonds, Wake Forest University).

These Hormone Replacement Therapy studies were obtained in post-menopausal women without hysterectomy. Estrogen / medroxyprogesterone (progestin) replacement after menopause in asymptomatic women (i.e., not for treating hot flashes, vaginal dryness, and cognitive effects) is thus a hotly debated women's gynecological health issue in view of these dangers. Prempro and other HRTs progesterone side effects are also controversial, raising the possibility of an FDA recall and drug lawsuits over personal injury.

A mare's nest of legal, medical, and scientific issues. No stranger to controversy in the courts over drug safety, Wyeth is not in as vulnerable a position as might be supposed at first glance. The reported increase in breast cancer noted in the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial* broke the predetermined safety limit for unacceptable incidence in breast cancer without satisfying some tests for statistical significance. Further clinical trials to definitively demonstrate an association may be prevented due to ethical considerations. Absent other data, plaintiffs alleging Prempro-induced breast cancer (estimated to number around 80,000) face some challenges in documenting causation. Allusion to some of the risks now documented were made in the physicians' label for Prempro, but received less attention than, for instance, the touted ability of lifelong Prempro use to prevent Alzheimer disease.

Prempro Litigation is expected to be controversial and complex.

Other comparable medications include: Activella - Pharmacia (Pfizer) - plant derived estrogen/progestin femhrt - Pfizer - norethindrone acetate (1 milligram ) and ethinyl estradiol (5 microgram) Ortho-Prefest - Ortho (Johnson & Johnson) 17(beta)-estradiol with the progestin norgestimate Premphase - Wyeth - medications customized for the cycle including Premarin only (estrogen) for the first two weeks followed by Premarin plus progestin for the balance of the cycle.

All of these drugs are in principal the same as Prempro but minor differences in composition, formulation, and delivery raise obstacles to direct extrapolation from Prempro. Will similar Litigation follow for these?

The very difficult question for sponsor Wyeth to answer is how their scientists could detect the beneficial ability of Prempro to retard colorectal cancer and hip fractures in clinical trials, and yet fail to note the more robust detrimental effects of Prempro on breast cancer, stroke, venous thromboembolism, and coronary heart disease. Alternatively, since the label mentions some of these sequelae, inadequate emphasis was conceivably given to these risk issues compared to the more modest beneficial effects. Indeed, alleging that Prempro is a defective product unsafe to be used in any manner might be a tenable position in a Class Action Lawsuit.

Lawyers, attorneys, and expert witnesses debate Prempro Pharmaceutical Litigation during a national Pharmaceutical Webcast, Oct. 13, 2002.

Although intended for leading lawyers and attorneys, interested groups and individuals can obtain the list of participants free of charge to identify the prestigious plaintiff and defense attorneys and expert witnesses in this field.